Repeat Sprint Ability
Flaws of Speed Reserve & "Feed The Cats"
Speed Reserve Is Half the Equation
Why Repeat Sprint Ability Isn’t Built by Repeating Sprints
Coaches love simple models.
“Feed the Cats.”
“Speed Reserve.”
“Train how you play.”
They’re clean. They’re memorable. They sound right.
But team sport physiology isn’t simple.
And repeated sprint ability (RSA) — one of the most important qualities in football, soccer, rugby, lacrosse, etc. — is not built by repeating sprints alone.
It’s built by developing two interacting systems:
RSA = Alactic Output + Aerobic Recovery Ability
Most discussions stop at the first half.
That’s where the problem begins.
The Seductive Logic of Speed Reserve
The speed reserve argument looks like this:
If an athlete increases max velocity from 10.9 m/s to 11.8 m/s, then 9.0 m/s becomes a lower percentage of max. Therefore, sub-maximal running becomes “easier.”
On paper, that math works.
In physiology, it’s incomplete.
Because the model assumes something that doesn’t exist in team sport:
Equal fatigue decay.
Games are not single efforts performed fresh.
They are:
Acceleration
Deceleration
Contact
Cognitive processing
Incomplete recovery
Repeated high-speed exposure
Speed reserve improves the ceiling.
It does not automatically improve sustainability.
And RSA is about sustainability.
The Repeat Sprint Trap
There’s another common assumption:
“If you want to improve repeat sprint ability, you should repeat sprints. SAID Principle”
Logical.
Also flawed.
True repeat sprint sessions (max effort, short rest) rapidly shift glycolytic. By the third or fourth sprint:
PCr is not fully restored
Oxidative metabolism rises
Lactate accumulates
Mechanics degrade
The session becomes metabolically chaotic.
It’s too intense to build aerobic capacity.
It’s too fatigued to build pure speed.
Volume collapses early.
It’s the equivalent of trying to build a 500 lb squat by only doing 95% singles every week.
You’ll test strength.
You won’t build it. Expression Vs. Development.
Repeat sprint training expresses RSA.
It does not optimally develop it.
What Actually Governs RSA
Repeated sprint ability depends on two interacting variables:
1. How fast you can sprint (Alactic output)
2. How quickly you can restore the energy to sprint again (aerobic recovery ability)
PCr resynthesis is aerobic-dependent.
Metabolite clearance is aerobic-dependent.
Heart rate recovery is aerobic-dependent.
If the aerobic system is underdeveloped:
Sprint decrement increases
Mechanics deteriorate
Injury risk rises
Late-game performance drops
You don’t lose because you aren’t fast enough.
You lose because you can’t repeat it.
Feed the Cat… or Raise a Hunter?
The “Feed the Cats” idea gets one thing right:
Over-fatiguing athletes destroys speed.
Agreed.
But if all you ever do is feed the cat steak and let it nap in the sun, you don’t raise a predator.
You raise a house cat.
Fast for one pounce.
Winded by the third chase.
Back on the porch by halftime.
Hunting all game isn’t about one explosive leap.
It’s about:
Explode
Reset
Re-accelerate
Recover
Repeat
That recovery between hunts?
That’s the aerobic system.
Speed exposure alone doesn’t build it.
You don’t need lactic punishment sessions.
But pretending recovery capacity develops automatically from max velocity work is wishful thinking.
The Converging Model
Instead of oscillating between pure speed days and random conditioning, the goal is convergence.
We build both halves of RSA simultaneously — without compromising either.
Early Phase:
High CNS days → Alactic speed
Low CNS days → Extensive tempo (aerobic foundation)
As we enter Special Preparation, structure becomes more football realistic.
But the physiology remains intact.
Early Off-Season: Vertical Integration
We believe in a high–low vertical integration model, popularized by Charlie Francis.
Everything is in the program at all times — just at varying intensities.
Speed is never removed.
Aerobic work is never removed.
Strength work is never removed.
We adjust dosage.
In the early off-season, we are farthest from competition. That gives us the most freedom to run a clean, true high–low structure.
Earliest Phase:
2 High CNS speed days
1 Extensive tempo day
Speed is emphasized, but aerobic development begins immediately.
This phase protects velocity while laying the oxidative foundation.
As the block progresses, we shift volume:
Progressed Early Phase:
2 Extensive tempo days
3 High CNS Speed days
Now we are accumulating meaningful aerobic volume while still preserving neural exposure.
Why?
Because you cannot layer density later without first building capacity.
This vertical integration model ensures:
Speed ceiling rises
Aerobic floor rises
Work capacity accumulates
Tissue tolerance improves
We do not wait until special prep to introduce aerobic development.
We build it from day one.
Special Preparation: Where Structure Evolves
As we move closer to camp, the clean high–low model blends into football reality.
Tactical demands increase. Practice duration expands.
But physiology remains intact.
The goal is still:
Increase alactic output.
Increase aerobic recovery ability.
Gradually integrate density.
Special Preparation Weekly Structure
Monday – Primer
~1,000-1,500 yards extensive tempo at 60–70%.
Controlled breathing.
Light technical integration.
Purpose:
Restore. Maintain aerobic base. Prepare for Tuesday.
Tuesday – Max Velocity + High-Speed Distance
Our highest intensity session.
300–400+ yards of high-speed distance
Acceleration + fly sprint exposures
Full recovery
Sprint–float–sprint mechanics
We integrate:
7-on-7 in open field
Routes on air
High-speed modulation within tactical work
This builds:
Neural ceiling
Tissue resilience
Game-relevant high-speed exposure
You cannot avoid high speed in training and expect to tolerate it in competition.
Tuesday raises the ceiling.
Wednesday – Practice Prep
This is our volume and resilience builder.
Targets:
3,000+ yards above 3 mph
400+ player loads
~2 hours on feet
High-speed sprinting is limited to COD work.
We integrate:
7-on-7 in the red zone
Routes on air in condensed space
Small-area high-intensity competition
The goal:
Build player load reserves.
Build total time-on-feet tolerance.
Replicate practice density.
Progression:
Early → Extensive tempo support
Mid → Controlled intensive tempo
Late (final 2 weeks) → Limited RSA clusters
We earn density.
We don’t start with it.
Thursday – Positional Extensive Tempo
Extensive tempo, but positional-specific.
Athletes must:
Identify alignment
Process assignment
Execute technique
Under controlled aerobic intensity.
This day maintains aerobic development while reinforcing skill and psychological stress similar to games.
It keeps athletes engaged without neural overload.
Friday – Acceleration Focus
Short distances.
High intent.
Full recovery.
We sharpen horizontal force and first-step power.
We leave the week primed, not drained.
Why This Works
Notice what we didn’t do:
No weekly lactic punishment
No early-phase RSA overload
No abandonment of aerobic development
Instead:
Build aerobic base
Build speed ceiling
Build volume tolerance
Layer density late
By the time RSA clusters are introduced near camp:
Decrement is smaller
HR recovery is faster
Mechanics hold
Volume tolerance exists
We don’t shock the system.
We prepare it.
What the Speed Reserve Graphic Misses
Speed reserve shows capability shift.
It does not show sustainability shift.
It assumes:
Equal fatigue decay
Fresh-state performance
Linear transfer
Games don’t operate in fresh-state conditions.
They operate under accumulated stress.
Speed reserve improves first-rep performance.
Aerobic development improves rep 5, rep 20, rep 40, rep 80+.
Football games are won over 3 hours of play.
The Real Equation
True RSA development is not:
Max Speed ↑
It is:
Max Speed ↑
Recovery Kinetics ↑
Sprint Decrement ↓
That requires:
Alactic exposure
Aerobic volume
Strategic progression
Intelligent weekly structure
Not metabolic chaos.
Not pampered house cats.
Hunters.
The Bottom Line
You don’t build repeat sprint ability by blindly repeating sprints.
You build it by:
aising the ceiling (speed)
Raising the floor (aerobic capacity)
Expanding volume tolerance
Compressing density at the right time
Feed the cat.
But make sure it learns to hunt all game.

Thanks for writing this, Nick. And maybe going out on a limb? Hard to believe any of your ideas would be controversial. But I’m sure they will be for a lot of coaches.
I don’t think coaches appreciate the benefits to the tissues of training repeated efforts. I can’t speak to football like you can, but certainly in basketball there is such a greater upside to improving in-game performance using your strategies compared to the FTC methodology.
I think FTC in the youth population works well given their physical immaturity and recoverability, but when you’re working with elite college or pros I would lean towards making the tissue more robust as a more predictive avenue towards performance improvements, especially if max capacities are getting to their limits.